Crosley CRSH268MW2 Manuel d'utilisateur

Naviguer en ligne ou télécharger Manuel d'utilisateur pour Non Crosley CRSH268MW2. Characterisation of New Potential Vaccine Candidates against Manuel d'utilisatio

  • Télécharger
  • Ajouter à mon manuel
  • Imprimer
  • Page
    / 88
  • Table des matières
  • MARQUE LIVRES
  • Noté. / 5. Basé sur avis des utilisateurs
Vue de la page 0
Characterisation of New Potential
Vaccine Candidates against Infections
caused by Staphylococcus aureus
Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades
der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät
der Universität zu Köln
vorgelegt von
Bettina Tosetti
aus Neuss
Vue de la page 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 87 88

Résumé du contenu

Page 1 - Bettina Tosetti

Characterisation of New PotentialVaccine Candidates against Infectionscaused by Staphylococcus aureusInaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgr

Page 2 - Prof. Dr. Jonathan C. Howard

2 Introduction1997; Patel et al., 1987; Peacock et al., 1999).2.2 Antibiotic resistance of S. aureusTo date antibiotics are the only effective therapy

Page 3 - Contents

2 Introduction2.3 Vaccination strategies against S. aureus2.3.1 Active immunisationSince first vaccination studies employing active immunisation using

Page 4

2 Introductionor SdrE significantly reduced the bacterial load in infected kidneys (Stranger-Jones et al.,2006). Moreover, as observed in the same stud

Page 5

2 Introductionpreparation targeting CP5 and CP8 obtained from volunteers immunised with StaphVaxTM(Altastaph; Nabi Biopharmaceuticals) failed to prove

Page 6 - 1 Abbreviations

2 Introductiontimicrobial actions mediated by antibodies. It was shown that IgM or IgG specific for Bor-relia burgdorferi surface proteins damage the s

Page 7

3 Material and Methods3.1 Material3.1.1 Chemicals and enzymesChemicals were of research grade and purchased from AppliChem, Merck, Sigma-Aldrich,ROTH

Page 8 - 2 Introduction

3 Material and MethodsMedia / Antibiotics CompositionLB -Medium 1 % Tryptone; 0.5 % Yeast extract; 0.5 % NaCl; pH 7.0LB-Agar1 % Tryptone; 0.5 % Yeast

Page 9

3 Material and MethodsBuffers and Solutions Composition10 % SDS 100 g SDS in 1000 ml A. bidest.Prehybridisation 3.5 x SSC, 0.1 % SDS, 10 mg/ml BSA in

Page 10

3 Material and MethodsBuffers and Solutions CompositionCoomassie stainingStaining solution 2.5 % Serva blue R250, 45 % Ethanol, 15 % Acetic acidDe-col

Page 11

3 Material and MethodsBuffers and Solutions CompositionElution buffer 0.1 M Glycine-HCl; pH 2.5Neutralisation buffer 1 M Tris-HCl; pH 9.03.1.4 Technic

Page 12

Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Martin KrönkeProf. Dr. Jonathan C. HowardTag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12.07.20102

Page 13

3 Material and MethodsDevice Specification ProviderTank-Blotter Trans-Blot cell (16x20 cm) Bio-RadTest-Tube-Rotator Model 34528 SnjidersThermomixer Com

Page 14 - 2.4 Aim of the study

3 Material and MethodsDesignation ManufacturerQIAprep Spin Miniprep QiagenQIAquick PCR Purification QiagenRNeasy Mini Kit QiagenSuperscript®III first st

Page 15 - 3 Material and Methods

3 Material and MethodsGene Name Sequence (5’ to 3’)qPCR ferritinferri-f CAG CAC CAA AAA TTG ACT TTT CAA Gferri-r TCT TGA CGA GCG ATT TCA GAT AAG TTA3.

Page 16

3 Material and Methods3.2 Methods3.2.1 Depletion of specific IgGs from IVIGS. aureus ATCC 29213 or E coli K12 XL1blue from an overnight (ON) culture wa

Page 17

3 Material and Methodsand the pellets washed once with ice-cold TE pH 8.0, and immediately subjected to RNAisolation3.2.3 RNA isolationSubsequent to w

Page 18

3 Material and MethodsThe Dye-coupling reaction was stopped by addition of 35 µl 100 mM NaOAc pH 5.2. Sam-ples intended for co-hybridisation were mixe

Page 19

3 Material and Methodsvs. PBS). Recommended settings for filtering criteria were applied to exclude signals fromthe dataset, which are not exceeding ba

Page 20

3 Material and Methodsurea for 2-D gel electrophoresis (2-DE). Protein concentration was determined using theBio-Rad DC assay in a 1:4 dilution accord

Page 21

3 Material and Methodstransformed into E. coli BL 21 for protein expression.Clones with the highest efficiency in the expression of the respective fusi

Page 22

3 Material and Methodswas neutralised by addition of a sufficient amount of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0). IgG-containingfractions were pooled and, after buffe

Page 23 - 3.2 Methods

Contents1 Abbreviations 62 Introduction 82.1 Clinical relevance and pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus . . . . . . . 82.2 Antibiotic resistance of

Page 24

3 Material and Methods3.2.14 In vitro opsonophagocytic killing of S. aureus by human neutrophilsTo assess killing of S. aureus by neutophils, in contr

Page 25

3 Material and Methods3.2.17 Statistical analysisGrowth curve results were statistically analysed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonfer-roni post analy

Page 26 - × LightCycler

4 Results4.1 Characterisation of the bacteriostatic effect mediated by S. aureusspecific IgGs4.1.1 Human serum inhibits in vitro growth of S. aureusIt

Page 27

4 Results0 60 120 180103104105106LB25% PBS25% human serum25% HI-serum*********t (min)CFU / ml0 60 120 180103104105106LB*********50% PBS50% HI-serum50%

Page 28

4 Results0 60 120 180103104105106LB25 % PBS25 % IVIG****t (min)CFU / ml0 60 120 180103104105106LB50 % PBS50 % IVIG*****t (min)CFU / mlABFigure 4.2:Ef

Page 29

4 Results4.1.3 Bacteriostatic effect on S. aureus is mediated by S. aureus specific IgGsTo ensure that the observed inhibitory effect mediated by IVIG

Page 30

4 Resultscontrol LB dSaPBS dSaIVIG dEcIVIG IVIG 0255075100125*********120 minCFU / ml(% of control)Figure 4.4:Effect of IVIG on in vitro growth of S.

Page 31

4 Results4.1.4 Gene expression profiling of S. aureus over the course of bacteriostasisTo elucidate the mechanism leading to the observed bacteriostati

Page 32 - 4 Results

4 Results39Function unknown19Inorganic compound transport & metabolism (15)12Amino acid transport & metabolism (3)11Co-enzyme metabolism (4)8N

Page 33 - ∗ ∗ ∗ = p < 0.001)

4 ResultsTable 4.1:Differentially expressed genes related to iron uptake and metabolism in IVIG versus dSaIVIGtreated samples revealed by microarray a

Page 34 - ∗ = p < 0.05;

Contents3.2.9 Subtractive proteome analysis (SUPRA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273.2.10 Cloning, expression and purification of vaccine candidates

Page 35

4 ResultsTo identify differentially expressed genes in IVIG treated samples at each time point (t0,t30 and t60), microarrays were hybridised in parall

Page 36

4 Results31 genes9Function unknown6Carbohydrate transport & metabolism3Energy production & conversion3Translation, ribosomal structure & b

Page 37 - CFU / ml

4 ResultsAll genes falling into one of these two categories, including potential regulators are listedin Table 4.2 (for all 78 genes see Table 9.3 in

Page 38

4 ResultsRogers, 1980; Goel and Kapil, 2001). Thus, quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) for selectediron related genes was applied to validate the micro

Page 39

4 Resultsmicroarray qPCRt0 t30 t60-4-2024fold changet0 t30 t60-4-2024fold changeA Bfurcatalaset0 t30 t60-4-2024fold changet0 t30 t60-4-2024fold change

Page 40

4 ResultsIVIG vs dSaIVIG dSaIVIG vs. PBSIVIG vs. PBSt0 t30 t60-4-2024fold changet0 t30 t60-4-2024fold changeABfurcatalaset0 t30 t60-4-2024fold changet

Page 41

4 Results4.2 Identification and characterisation of potential vaccine candidatesagainst S. aureus4.2.1 Subtractive proteome analysis (SUPRA) of anchorl

Page 42

4 Results204320392037/2038222120362042205020532056215521612219222224252406hp2160"2158kDa310pI21304566972037/2038222120422050205320562155216122192

Page 43

4 ResultsTable 4.3: Immunogenic anchorless cell wall proteins from S. aureus ATCC 29213 identified by SUPRAGI protein Spot ID Predicted function pIa)MW

Page 44

4 ResultsFurthermore, the two most obvious candidates S. aureus protein A (Spa, several spotsbetween 45 and 66 kDa) and immunodominant antigen A (IsaA

Page 45

Contents7 Zusammenfassung 668 Bibliography 689 Supplement 7810 Danksagung 8611 Erklärung 8712 Lebenslauf 885

Page 46

4 ResultsAE. coliLysBL21-BT1 Lyspur. BT1170130100705540352515BT1anti-BT1170130100705540352515E. coliLysBL21-BT2 Lyspur. BT2BT2anti-BT21701301007055403

Page 47

4 Results10010110210310480706050403020100Serum75.4 %10010110210310480706050403020100HI-Serum77.2 %10010110210310480706050403020100anti-BT147.4 %100101

Page 48

4 Results0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10020406080100120dSaIVIGIVIG anti-BT32.5% HI-serumno ABanti-BT1anti-BT2*******************t (min)Bacterial surv

Page 49

4 Resultschallenged intravenously with 3 x 107CFU of S. aureus strain ATCC 29213 one week afterthe second booster immunisation. For two weeks infected

Page 50

4 Results0 5 10 15020406080100BT1BSAP= 0,0488t (days)Percent survival0 5 10 15020406080100BT2BSAP= 0,6821t (days)Percent survival0 5 10 15020406080100

Page 51

4 Results0 5 10 15020406080100BT1BSAp = 0.0168t (days)Percent survival0 5 10 15020406080100BT3BSAp = 0.2787t (days)Percent survival0 5 10 150204060801

Page 52 - Bacterial survival (%)

5 DiscussionS. aureus causes apart from minor skin infections severe life-threatening invasive diseaseslike pneumonia, endocarditis and sepsis in heal

Page 53

5 Discussioncould be depleted by over night co-incubation of IVIG with S. aureus (dSaIVIG), thus provingthat S. aureus specific IgGs mediate the inhibi

Page 54

5 Discussionthat the expression of iron related genes was altered due to dSaIVIG treatment, hence notrepresenting the mechanism underlying bacteriosta

Page 55 - Percent survival

5 Discussion5.2 Identification and characterisation of potential vaccine candidatesagainst Staphylococcus aureusThe steadily growing interest in a prot

Page 56 - 5 Discussion

1 Abbreviationsaa-dUTP 5-(3-Aminoallyl)-2’-deoxyuridine 5’-triphosphateACW-proteins Anchorless cell wall proteinsANOVA Analysis of varianceAPS Ammoniu

Page 57

5 Discussionremains the identification of eligible candidate proteins (Projan et al., 2006). The major pre-requisite for a target protein is the expres

Page 58

5 DiscussionSince ACW proteins are not traceable by bioinformatic genome screenings, we applied aproteomic approach on an ACW-protein preparation from

Page 59

5 Discussionreach statistical significance.Since the previously obtained results concerning eno, oxo and hp2160 demonstrated thatthese in vitro assays

Page 60

5 DiscussionBT3.Remarkably SUPRA led to the identification of 39 immunogenic proteins within the ACW-proteins of S. aureus. The results obtained to dat

Page 61

6 AbstractDue to the rapid emergence of S. aureus strains resistant to multiple antibiotics and thetherewith increased mortality rates, the developmen

Page 62

6 Abstractextent using dSaIVIG were identified by MALDI-TOF analysis. SUPRA led to the identifica-tion of 37 new potential vaccine candidates among ACW

Page 63

7 ZusammenfassungBedingt durch die rasante Entstehung multiresistenter S. aureus (MRSA) Stämmen undder damit einhergehenden gestiegenen Mortalität, is

Page 64 - 6 Abstract

7 Zusammenfassungpolyvalenten Vakzine gegen S. aureus erweitern. Zu diesem Zweck wurde eine neue sub-traktive Proteom Analyse (SUPRA) von Zellwand-ass

Page 65

8 BibliographyANTELMANN, H., H. YAMAMOTO, J. SEKIGUCHI, and M. HECKER, 2002. Stabilization of cellwall proteins in Bacillus subtilis: a proteomic appr

Page 66 - 7 Zusammenfassung

8 BibliographyBERNARDO, K., N. PAKULAT, S. FLEER, A. SCHNAITH, O. UTERMÖHLEN, O. KRUT,S. MÜLLER, and M. KRÖNKE, 2004. Subinhibitory concentrations of

Page 67

1 Abbreviationshp2160 hypothetical protein similar to esterase (spot ID 2160)IEF Isoelectric focussingIgG Immunoglobulin GIgM Immunoglobulin MIPG Immo

Page 68 - 8 Bibliography

8 BibliographyCONNOLLY, S. E., D. G. THANASSI, and J. L. BENACH, 2004. Generation of a Complement-Independent Bactericidal IgM against a Relapsing Fev

Page 69

8 Bibliographycomposed of Staphylococcus aureus type 5 and type 8 capsular polysaccharides conju-gated to Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. Infect Im

Page 70

8 BibliographyGOEL, V. and A. KAPIL, 2001. Monoclonal antibodies against the iron regulated outermembrane Proteins of Acinetobacter baumannii are bact

Page 71

8 Bibliographycus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections.Ann Intern Med, 144(5) 309–17KLEVENS, R. M., M. A.

Page 72

8 BibliographyMAIRA-LITRAN, T., A. KROPEC, D. GOLDMANN, and G. B. PIER, 2004. Biologic propertiesand vaccine potential of the staphylococcal poly-N-ac

Page 73

8 BibliographyPATEL, A. H., P. NOWLAN, E. D. WEAVERS, and T. FOSTER, 1987. Virulence of proteinA-deficient and alpha-toxin-deficient mutants of Staphylo

Page 74

8 BibliographyRUPP, M. E., J. HOLLEY, H. P., J. LUTZ, P. V. DICPINIGAITIS, C. W. WOODS, D. P. LEVINE,N. VENEY, and J. FOWLER, V. G., 2007. Phase II, r

Page 75

8 BibliographyVERNACHIO, J. H., A. S. BAYER, B. AMES, D. BRYANT, B. D. PRATER, P. J. SYRIBEYS,E. L. GOROVITS, and J. M. PATTI, 2006. Human immunoglobu

Page 76

9 SupplementTable 9.1: Differentially expressed genes in IVIG versus dSaIVIG and IVIG versus PBSCommona)Predicted function GI proteint0 t30 t60FC 1b)F

Page 77

9 SupplementList of the 236 differentially expressed genes in IVIG compared to dSaIVIG treated samples (con-tinued)Commona)Predicted function GI prote

Page 78 - 9 Supplement

2 Introduction2.1 Clinical relevance and pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureusStaphlococcus aureus is a facultatively anaerobic gram-positive coccus,

Page 79

9 SupplementList of the 236 differentially expressed genes in IVIG compared to dSaIVIG treated samples (con-tinued)Commona)Predicted function GI prote

Page 80

9 SupplementList of the 236 differentially expressed genes in IVIG compared to dSaIVIG treated samples (con-tinued)Commona)Predicted function GI prote

Page 81

9 SupplementList of the 236 differentially expressed genes in IVIG compared to dSaIVIG treated samples (con-tinued)Commona)Predicted function GI prote

Page 82

9 SupplementList of the 236 differentially expressed genes in IVIG compared to dSaIVIG treated samples (con-tinued)Commona)Predicted function GI prote

Page 83

9 SupplementTable 9.3: List of the 78 differentially expressed genes in IVIG compared to PBS treated samplesCommona)Predicted function GI proteint0t30

Page 84

9 SupplementList of the 78 differentially expressed genes in IVIG compared to PBS treated samples (continued)Common Predicted function GI proteint0t30

Page 85

10 DanksagungFür die wertvollen Diskussionen und Ideen sowie die engagierte Leitung während der ge-samten Arbeit möchte ich mich bei Herrn Prof. Dr. M

Page 86 - 10 Danksagung

11 ErklärungIch versichere, dass ich die von mir vorgelegte Dissertation selbständig angefertigt,die benutzten Quellen und Hilfsmittel vollständig ang

Page 87 - 11 Erklärung

12 LebenslaufAngaben zur PersonName Bettina TosettiGeburtsdatum und -ort 21.02.1978, NeussFamilienstand ledigStaatsangehörigkeit deutschHochschulausbi

Page 88 - 12 Lebenslauf

2 IntroductionBesides covalently linked protein adhesins, also anchorless cell wall proteins (ACW pro-teins) mediating adhesion to extracellular matri

Commentaires sur ces manuels

Pas de commentaire